Journalists got a look at San Quentin’s death chamber in 2010, where executions will occur if the state ever resumes them. (Los Angeles Times)
I write often about the inequities of the American capital punishment system, including the arbitrary nature of the decision to pursue the death penalty, the whims or malevolence of the prosecuting side and juries and the fundamental inhumanity of the execution itself.
A few days ago, I wrote about the nature of those who wind up getting executed. This year 11 of 25 executions were of people who had displayed “significant evidence of mental illness,” nine of the condemned showed “evidence of brain injury, developmental brain damage, or an IQ in the intellectually disabled range,” and at least 11 were abused as children.
What did they have in common? They also tend to wind up with bad lawyers, a function of their relative poverty. Where wealthy individual charged with murder can afford to hire higher caliber lawyers, the poor tend to get assigned counsel that the government pays for who historically have included a high percentage of the incompetent.
Source: latimes.com – Los Angeles Times