Marc Jacobs Beauty Lust & Stardust See-quins Eyeshadows Reviews & Swatches

• Kat Von D Cathedral (LE, ) is more shimmery, darker (90% similar).
• NARS Parallax (LE, $25.00) is lighter, warmer (90% similar).
• MAC Say It Isn’t So (P, $18.00) is lighter (90% similar).
• Urban Decay Dark Cloud (P, $20.00) is darker (90% similar).
• NARS Jardin Perdu (Left) (DC, $25.00) is less shimmery, lighter (90% similar).
• Guerlain Les Gris #4 (P, ) is less shimmery, lighter, warmer (90% similar).
• Dior Blue Garden #5 (LE, ) is less shimmery, lighter (85% similar).
• bareMinerals Gunmetal (P, $18.00) is less shimmery, darker, cooler (85% similar).
• Colour Pop Snooze (LE, $5.00) is more shimmery, darker (85% similar).
• Pat McGrath Sterling (LE, $25.00) is lighter, warmer (85% similar).

Formula Overview

$28.00/0.12 oz. – $233.33 Per Ounce

The formula is supposed to add a "super-shimmering dimension to any look" with a "demi-pressed process" that has "high-impact dazzle with smooth glide and bold color." Per the brand, it can be "packed on for intense glitter or blended for a soft wash of sparkle." They recommend packing it on with a fingertip or using a flat, synthetic brush in a "gentle pressing motion." I was surprised at how well they applied with a flat, synthetic brush, as I was able to apply all six shades using a flat, synthetic brush (MAC 247s and 242s) and gently pressed the product against my lid and have most of the product adhere without lots of fallout. When I pressed on an eyeshadow, I gently press and then pull in a direction (depending on what and where I’m applying). The formula yielded very shiny, sparkling color that was intense and bright while still offering pigmentation from the base color, too.

They have a very loosely-packed texture–they seem more like a 40-60% loose product, and it was important to use the included "pigment press" to keep the surface flat. I also found that a little went a long way with most shades, and I could see fallout becoming an issue if too much product was on the brush. I usually just pressed the brush gentle on the surface and that was good enough for coverage on my lid. They lasted for eight and a half hours on me before creasing faintly, and there was slight fallout over time but nothing that reached the point where it seemed distracting/noticeable to anyone looking at me. Frankly, I was extremely impressed with how easily they applied, adhered, and lasted on me while delivering on high impact dazzle and bold color. Using fingertips worked for getting even adhesion, but I have always found it harder to be precise with my fingertips on my lid, and I did feel like my fingertip was picking up more product than I needed so there was a bit more fallout when I attempted using my fingertips.

Browse all of our Marc Jacobs Beauty See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow swatches.

Ingredients

• Huda Beauty Ruby #6 (LE, ) is less shimmery, darker (90% similar).
• Colour Pop Something Special (LE, $4.50) is less shimmery, darker (85% similar).
• Marc Jacobs Beauty Blitz Glitz (LE, $28.00) is darker (85% similar).
• Colour Pop Revolution (P, $5.00) is more shimmery, lighter, warmer (80% similar).
• Anastasia Rose Gold (Norvina) (LE, $12.00) is more shimmery, lighter, warmer (80% similar).
• Urban Decay Extragalactic (P, $20.00) is more shimmery, darker (80% similar).
• BH Cosmetics Foil Eyes #23 (PiP, ) is more shimmery, lighter, warmer (80% similar).
• Fenty Beauty Ultraviolit (LE, ) is more shimmery, darker, warmer (80% similar).

Formula Overview

$28.00/0.12 oz. – $233.33 Per Ounce

The formula is supposed to add a "super-shimmering dimension to any look" with a "demi-pressed process" that has "high-impact dazzle with smooth glide and bold color." Per the brand, it can be "packed on for intense glitter or blended for a soft wash of sparkle." They recommend packing it on with a fingertip or using a flat, synthetic brush in a "gentle pressing motion." I was surprised at how well they applied with a flat, synthetic brush, as I was able to apply all six shades using a flat, synthetic brush (MAC 247s and 242s) and gently pressed the product against my lid and have most of the product adhere without lots of fallout. When I pressed on an eyeshadow, I gently press and then pull in a direction (depending on what and where I’m applying). The formula yielded very shiny, sparkling color that was intense and bright while still offering pigmentation from the base color, too.

They have a very loosely-packed texture–they seem more like a 40-60% loose product, and it was important to use the included "pigment press" to keep the surface flat. I also found that a little went a long way with most shades, and I could see fallout becoming an issue if too much product was on the brush. I usually just pressed the brush gentle on the surface and that was good enough for coverage on my lid. They lasted for eight and a half hours on me before creasing faintly, and there was slight fallout over time but nothing that reached the point where it seemed distracting/noticeable to anyone looking at me. Frankly, I was extremely impressed with how easily they applied, adhered, and lasted on me while delivering on high impact dazzle and bold color. Using fingertips worked for getting even adhesion, but I have always found it harder to be precise with my fingertips on my lid, and I did feel like my fingertip was picking up more product than I needed so there was a bit more fallout when I attempted using my fingertips.

Browse all of our Marc Jacobs Beauty See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow swatches.

Ingredients

• MAC Whisper Pink (LE, $21.00) is more shimmery, lighter (90% similar).
• Tom Ford Beauty White Suede (Nordstrom) #1 (LE, ) is more shimmery, lighter, cooler (85% similar).
• BH Cosmetics Carli Bybel Deluxe Edition #6 (LE, ) is lighter, warmer (85% similar).
• Colour Pop Can’t Party Wait (LE, ) is lighter (85% similar).
• Urban Decay Specter (PiP, $20.00) is lighter, warmer (85% similar).
• Tom Ford Beauty Cool (Winter 2016) Eyeshadow #1 (LE, ) is less shimmery, lighter, warmer (85% similar).
• Coloured Raine Hi Cutie (LE, $6.99) is darker, cooler (85% similar).
• NARS Atomic (LE, $22.00) is lighter, warmer (85% similar).
• Maybelline Rose Riot (140) (LE, $6.99) is less shimmery, lighter (85% similar).
• MAC Noble Descent (LE, $19.50) is lighter, warmer (85% similar).

Formula Overview

$28.00/0.12 oz. – $233.33 Per Ounce

The formula is supposed to add a "super-shimmering dimension to any look" with a "demi-pressed process" that has "high-impact dazzle with smooth glide and bold color." Per the brand, it can be "packed on for intense glitter or blended for a soft wash of sparkle." They recommend packing it on with a fingertip or using a flat, synthetic brush in a "gentle pressing motion." I was surprised at how well they applied with a flat, synthetic brush, as I was able to apply all six shades using a flat, synthetic brush (MAC 247s and 242s) and gently pressed the product against my lid and have most of the product adhere without lots of fallout. When I pressed on an eyeshadow, I gently press and then pull in a direction (depending on what and where I’m applying). The formula yielded very shiny, sparkling color that was intense and bright while still offering pigmentation from the base color, too.

They have a very loosely-packed texture–they seem more like a 40-60% loose product, and it was important to use the included "pigment press" to keep the surface flat. I also found that a little went a long way with most shades, and I could see fallout becoming an issue if too much product was on the brush. I usually just pressed the brush gentle on the surface and that was good enough for coverage on my lid. They lasted for eight and a half hours on me before creasing faintly, and there was slight fallout over time but nothing that reached the point where it seemed distracting/noticeable to anyone looking at me. Frankly, I was extremely impressed with how easily they applied, adhered, and lasted on me while delivering on high impact dazzle and bold color. Using fingertips worked for getting even adhesion, but I have always found it harder to be precise with my fingertips on my lid, and I did feel like my fingertip was picking up more product than I needed so there was a bit more fallout when I attempted using my fingertips.

Browse all of our Marc Jacobs Beauty See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow swatches.

Ingredients

• Linda Hallberg Cosmetics Moonwake (PiP, ) is lighter (90% similar).
• Natasha Denona Peach (P, $28.00) is lighter, warmer (90% similar).
• Pat McGrath VR Violet (PiP, $25.00) is more muted, cooler (90% similar).
• Natasha Denona Awakening (PiP, $29.00) is less shimmery, lighter (90% similar).
• Bad Habit Sky’s the Limit (PiP, ) is less shimmery, lighter (85% similar).
• Colour Pop Strawberry Jam (P, $8.00) is lighter, warmer (85% similar).
• Make Up For Ever 108 Burgundy (P, $26.00) is darker (85% similar).
• Natasha Denona Botanic (192M) (PiP, $29.00) is less shimmery, lighter, warmer (85% similar).
• Colour Pop Rayon (PiP, $4.50) is darker (85% similar).
• Colour Pop Miser (LE, $4.50) is lighter, cooler (80% similar).

Formula Overview

$28.00/0.12 oz. – $233.33 Per Ounce

The formula is supposed to add a "super-shimmering dimension to any look" with a "demi-pressed process" that has "high-impact dazzle with smooth glide and bold color." Per the brand, it can be "packed on for intense glitter or blended for a soft wash of sparkle." They recommend packing it on with a fingertip or using a flat, synthetic brush in a "gentle pressing motion." I was surprised at how well they applied with a flat, synthetic brush, as I was able to apply all six shades using a flat, synthetic brush (MAC 247s and 242s) and gently pressed the product against my lid and have most of the product adhere without lots of fallout. When I pressed on an eyeshadow, I gently press and then pull in a direction (depending on what and where I’m applying). The formula yielded very shiny, sparkling color that was intense and bright while still offering pigmentation from the base color, too.

They have a very loosely-packed texture–they seem more like a 40-60% loose product, and it was important to use the included "pigment press" to keep the surface flat. I also found that a little went a long way with most shades, and I could see fallout becoming an issue if too much product was on the brush. I usually just pressed the brush gentle on the surface and that was good enough for coverage on my lid. They lasted for eight and a half hours on me before creasing faintly, and there was slight fallout over time but nothing that reached the point where it seemed distracting/noticeable to anyone looking at me. Frankly, I was extremely impressed with how easily they applied, adhered, and lasted on me while delivering on high impact dazzle and bold color. Using fingertips worked for getting even adhesion, but I have always found it harder to be precise with my fingertips on my lid, and I did feel like my fingertip was picking up more product than I needed so there was a bit more fallout when I attempted using my fingertips.

Browse all of our Marc Jacobs Beauty See-quins Glam Glitter Eyeshadow swatches.

Ingredients